This is How a Liberal Supports Terror from a U.N. Pulpit

Almost everyone in America can agree that the Boston Marathon bombings were a heinous act of terror; everyone except Richard Falk, the  United Nations Human Rights Councils Special Rapporteur.  No this professor emeritus of international law at Princeton University believes that Boston is getting what it deserved.

What, surely you’re thinking you read this wrong.  Nein. This D-bag just wrote an article in the Foreign Policy Journal, sourced below, called A Commentary on the Marathon Murders. Let me also state that this decorated and learned imitation of a man has also been exposed as a 9/11 truther.  Are you kidding, Popular Mechanics debunked those idiots and sent them to the sidelines, but here he is anyway.

He starts his article by calling America a country that embraced Islamophobic falsehoods after 9/11 and then spends a paragraph bitching about George Bush seeking a pretext to war.  Okay kook, what next. Let’s see Obama presidency, illegal wars, bloodthirsty Israel, etc. Typical terror apologist lead up to his next bit.

Then he wrote, “The American global domination project is bound to generate all kinds of resistance in the post-colonial world. In some respects, the United States has been fortunate not to experience worse blowbacks, and these may yet happen, especially if there is no disposition to rethink US relations to others in the world, starting with the Middle East.”

What? What American global domination.  I ask as an American show me one country we have colonized and Americanized through force and assimilation through occupation.  Yet, this is exactly why we are being attacked?  This makes no sense.  Could it be that we are attacked because we have a large Christian population in a Democratic society that is largely accepting of everyone including those the terrorists hate.  Could it be that the freedom of both action and thought for men and women along with equality of all sorts is threatening to their way of life and beliefs and that is why we get attacked.  I must be wrong clearly it is because we are taking over the world.

Let’s see then he goes on, disparages the President for not rolling over and getting rid of Israel, oh more Israel hating, then some tripe before finishing.  It’s the finish that gets you. This libtard likens the victims of the bombing to canaries that served as a litmus test for miners working in a dangerous environment.  Except America is the dangerous environment and he wonders, “How many canaries will have to die before we awaken from our geopolitical fantasy of global domination?

Wow, talk about trivialization of the bombing to be used as a political tool.  It is not surprising this American douche is loved by the 56 member stated of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) at the U.N.  An organization that refused to define terrorism at the U.N. last week unless and exception for “legitimate struggle” was created.  Oh, and they control the balance of power on the human rights council, controlling 26 of the 47 seats through majorities in both the African and Asian groups.

According to the U.N. then and Mr. Falk, the Boston bombing must have been a legitimate struggle against our post-colonial globalism or some such bulls#$%. Either way it makes the U.N., Falk, and all the Libtards who think like them tacit supporters of terrorism because of their refusal to see any attack on American soil as a legitimate attack (9/11 truthers) or undeserved.

Source Here.